EVE Search - Sticky:[Odyssey] Navy Battleships

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Sticky:[Odyssey] Navy Battleships

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 8 post(s)
Debora Tsung The Investment Bankers Guild 128	Posted - 2013.05.14 07:56:00 - [1] - Quote Turelus wrote: CNR is king of PVE again? Now that I read that I might have to buy one and name it Elvis... There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper.
Debora Tsung The Investment Bankers Guild 128	Posted - 2013.05.14 11:15:00 - [2] - Quote Gimme more Cynos wrote: Malcanis wrote: Again: produce a scenario where the Cruise CNR will be worse after Odessey than before. Fit Torps - Done. (just trolling a little) To be more serious, the new CNR will struggle with fittings, no utility highslot anymore, not enough CPU/PG to fit an active Tank (with cap-boosters ofcourse) etc.. The New one will have better damage application, You might even get away wit using one less TP, so You'll have more tank with the new one... There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper.
Debora Tsung The Investment Bankers Guild 134	Posted - 2013.05.21 14:06:00 - [3] - Quote EXIA MIKOSZ wrote: The most exensive Navy Ship setups I've ever seen. a¦á_a¦á To expensive. Were is the roothless efficiency when You need it... Also, throwing more iskies at Ships doesn't make them better. You can do that with other ships, too. There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper.
Debora Tsung The Investment Bankers Guild 134	Posted - 2013.05.21 14:26:00 - [4] - Quote EXIA MIKOSZ wrote: Debora Tsung wrote: EXIA MIKOSZ wrote: The most exensive Navy Ship setups I've ever seen. a¦á_a¦á To expensive. Were is the roothless efficiency when You need it... Also, throwing more iskies at Ships doesn't make them better. You can do that with other ships, too. I Liked to make setup like this and i did it i have sp for raven and i dont want use another ships its up to me what im using and you can be sure people using more expensive fits just for pve Maybe for you its stupid but you will not define someone play style ... isn't this the thread where we can complain about the latest navy BS Buff/Nerfs? If You are defending the new CNR then do not do so by telling us that it would actually be quite decent if we fit everything with officer stuff. That doesn't make that ship, any ship, better. Mainly because every e-rich player can do that to any other ship, too and then Your ship is just as bad as before only more expensive. Or in other words, a pile of dog poo doesn't stink less just because the other pile right next to it is bigger. There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper.
Debora Tsung The Investment Bankers Guild 137	Posted - 2013.05.22 11:02:00 - [5] - Quote EXIA MIKOSZ wrote: First where im defending CNR???I just wrote example how this changes apply to setup like this. What im doing its defending My Choice of Ship and his setup Maybe some ships and setups are much much better and less expensive but im using what i like Second where you see in my setup Officer Modules?All i can see its a deadspace Next Time i will use t2 modules for comparing so that will be easier for you o_O My understanding of the english language might not be at the top nodge of... well, anything. But I do believe the following sentences of Yours might very well be counted as a defense of the latest CNR changes. EXIA MIKOSZ wrote: In the End im loosing 15% explosion velocity Bonus from Rig,0.42 sRof and almost 12m sig radious from changes Thats Nothing with that amount of boosted DPS And Yes, use either T1 Meta 4 or T2 Modules for Your basic examples and/or comparisons. Deadspace Modules Officer Fits, Facton modules... That's all bullshit. A good fit or a good ship is not made by the amount of ISK You throw at it but by how You fit it for which purpose. There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper.
Debora Tsung The Investment Bankers Guild 139	Posted - 2013.05.29 10:14:00 - [6] - Quote Malcanis wrote: [quote=dagley]I don't think you get what "tiercide" means. It means "death to tiers". Strange that You say that, as it feels like the Tiers just have been renamed. there's an Attack Tier, now, and a Combat Tier, and some third Tier whichs name I have forgotten right now... :/ There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.